It is a mock civil trial. I'm the Plaintiff's counsel representing Friends and Family of the Hungarian Jews (and Sephardic Jews of Greece) deported to, and murdered at, Auschwitz in May through July 1944.
The Defendant's counsel has *already* conceded the first three items of the Complaint:
1) Kidnapping (from Hungary and Greece);
2) Wrongful transport of my clients out of their countries;
3) Wrongful imprisonment in Auschwitz;
4) Wrongful death;
5) Wrongful death specifically through use of Zyklon B in a homicidal gas chamber.
So the only remaining items in contention are Items 4 and 5.
Matt, *please* either get in touch with me at my gmail address (last name first name, all one word) or here.
The case for approximately one million Jews being executed by Zyklon B at Auschwitz-Birkenau is absolutely unassailable. I think that should be one of the linchpins of any debate about the Holocaust. Please see my comments thus far on the Ron Unz webpage I referenced above. In particular, please see my comment #19, which includes excerpts from an October 2, 1945 article in the British newspaper, the Guardian. It is about testimony by Dr. Charles Bendel, a Jewish doctor imprisoned at Auschwitz:
Again, Matt, *please* interact with me either here or by email. I think a can provide you with a great deal of help in your efforts to show the truth of the Holocaust.
Best wishes,
Mark Bahner (gmail is last name, first name without periods)
He didn't back out of the debate - you proposed to use German documents and to not translate them and to argue in a deceptive way - like the slander that is the holocaust you continue to slander. I can't wait for your so called 'defense' of the holocaust!!!!! 😂
Mike has stated repeatedly he would be glad to debate you if you agree to certain standards - which you seem to of been loathe to agree to including any documents used need to be provided to both parties and that the event is not hosted by a clearly biased holocaust affirming host. Why do you lie????
Thomas Dalton is fluent in German and higher IQ than Mike. (Not saying Mike is stupid, but Dalton is smarter.) Dalton has published a book on Holocaust handbooks and has written translations of Nazi stuff. (Dalton is a crazed antisemite but also able and intelligent.)
I don't suggest you fear Enoch. In fact, I do respect that you are even willing to argue the holocaust. I just find it an unfair depiction of Mike. Why do you need to slander him? If he does the debate post it and if not then don't post anything. It just comes off as low brow.
"low brow"? Yeah I think "call out" posts are inevitably such.
But my motive here is not to deprecate Mike; it's to pressure him to do the debate and not back out. I noted in the piece that I'm going to delete the 'call out' post (On Mike Enoch's Weak Knees) if he ends up doing the debate.
Hi,
The "trial of the century" is going to happen over at the Ron Unz Review website:
https://www.unz.com/announcement/the-holocaust-debate/
It is a mock civil trial. I'm the Plaintiff's counsel representing Friends and Family of the Hungarian Jews (and Sephardic Jews of Greece) deported to, and murdered at, Auschwitz in May through July 1944.
The Defendant's counsel has *already* conceded the first three items of the Complaint:
1) Kidnapping (from Hungary and Greece);
2) Wrongful transport of my clients out of their countries;
3) Wrongful imprisonment in Auschwitz;
4) Wrongful death;
5) Wrongful death specifically through use of Zyklon B in a homicidal gas chamber.
So the only remaining items in contention are Items 4 and 5.
Matt, *please* either get in touch with me at my gmail address (last name first name, all one word) or here.
The case for approximately one million Jews being executed by Zyklon B at Auschwitz-Birkenau is absolutely unassailable. I think that should be one of the linchpins of any debate about the Holocaust. Please see my comments thus far on the Ron Unz webpage I referenced above. In particular, please see my comment #19, which includes excerpts from an October 2, 1945 article in the British newspaper, the Guardian. It is about testimony by Dr. Charles Bendel, a Jewish doctor imprisoned at Auschwitz:
https://www.theguardian.com/century/1940-1949/Story/0,,127738,00.html
...and also this photo of a mimeographed affidavit by the same Dr. Charles Bendel:
https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/education/resources/holocaust/gas-chambers-crematoria-birkenau/
Again, Matt, *please* interact with me either here or by email. I think a can provide you with a great deal of help in your efforts to show the truth of the Holocaust.
Best wishes,
Mark Bahner (gmail is last name, first name without periods)
He didn't back out of the debate - you proposed to use German documents and to not translate them and to argue in a deceptive way - like the slander that is the holocaust you continue to slander. I can't wait for your so called 'defense' of the holocaust!!!!! 😂
Mike has stated repeatedly he would be glad to debate you if you agree to certain standards - which you seem to of been loathe to agree to including any documents used need to be provided to both parties and that the event is not hosted by a clearly biased holocaust affirming host. Why do you lie????
Thomas Dalton is fluent in German and higher IQ than Mike. (Not saying Mike is stupid, but Dalton is smarter.) Dalton has published a book on Holocaust handbooks and has written translations of Nazi stuff. (Dalton is a crazed antisemite but also able and intelligent.)
Why would I fear Mike but readily debate Dalton?
I don't suggest you fear Enoch. In fact, I do respect that you are even willing to argue the holocaust. I just find it an unfair depiction of Mike. Why do you need to slander him? If he does the debate post it and if not then don't post anything. It just comes off as low brow.
Lol I'm not landering him.
"low brow"? Yeah I think "call out" posts are inevitably such.
But my motive here is not to deprecate Mike; it's to pressure him to do the debate and not back out. I noted in the piece that I'm going to delete the 'call out' post (On Mike Enoch's Weak Knees) if he ends up doing the debate.