Your articles have consistently served as a necessary rejoinder to the most deranged atrocity denial across a lot of mainstream media.
It’s intriguing how the same criteria used to previously estimate casualties are now deemed as categorically unreliable by many segments of the press when used for dead Palestinians in Gaza.
I can't comment on History Speaks' attack on the report by Andrew Fox, except for two general comments:
At least Andrew Fox has a real name on his report.
In his demolition of the Fox analysis of the figures provided by the Gaza Ministry of Health, History Speaks seems to accept its figures as being valid and in good faith. That hasn't necessarily been the case in the past.
Your articles have consistently served as a necessary rejoinder to the most deranged atrocity denial across a lot of mainstream media.
It’s intriguing how the same criteria used to previously estimate casualties are now deemed as categorically unreliable by many segments of the press when used for dead Palestinians in Gaza.
Thanks. I hope I have played some small part on behalf of the truth, and to help explain what has happened to the people of Gaza.
"Andrew Fox's Attempted Whitewash of the Gaza Genocide"
"History Speaks" calls recent events the "Gaza Genocide"? Why does "History" call it "Genocide"?
I can't comment on History Speaks' attack on the report by Andrew Fox, except for two general comments:
At least Andrew Fox has a real name on his report.
In his demolition of the Fox analysis of the figures provided by the Gaza Ministry of Health, History Speaks seems to accept its figures as being valid and in good faith. That hasn't necessarily been the case in the past.